In the process of developing plans and alternative courses of action COAevaluation criteria action plan retail, multiple criteria or factors should be used to determine the validity of each proposed plan. The criteria should be assessed and considered prior to any systematic comparative evaluation of plans.
This is true in business, military and general organizational planning situations. The criteria are often relevant in personal planning situations as well. Any computerized planning DSS should provide a "checklist" or an organized set of rating scales that can be used to assess the validity of each alternative plan COA based on seven criteria: A valid plan or COA meets minimum standards and hence an invalid COA has failed on one or more of the seven criteria of "goodness" used to evaluate specific COA plans; a course of action plan that is deficient on one or more criteria should be revised or rejected.
The challenge in computerizing plan evaluation criteria, especially these seven criteria, is that the terms are familiar words that are hard to operationalize. Also, the terms used for the criteria are interrelated and overlapping www aarp medicare rx plans. In a computerized planning and decision support system the criteria need to be defined and used consistently and users of the system need a shared understanding of what the terms mean.
Progress evaluation criteria action plan retail be made in reaching agreement on the meaning and operationalization of these terms if a computerized contingency planning system is to be useful. The remainder of this analysis discusses each of the seven evaluation concepts terms. The concepts are intended as "attributes of a plan and COA" so one should be able to discern there presence or absence by examining a specific plan.
An attribute is a descriptor of a planned course of case study about bronchial asthma and hence an adjective should be used as the identifing term. The term used for the corresponding criterion should be a noun. Acceptable ; the criterion is acceptability. A plan is acceptable if it accomplishes the given mission or purpose and it is deemed worth the risks.
Acceptability determines whether a contemplated course of action COA is worth the evaluation criteria action plan retail of manpower, materiel, and time involved; and is consistent evaluation criteria action plan retail legal constraints. Synonyms for acceptable include: The dictionary defines acceptable as satisfactory or adequate.
Adequate ; the criterion is adequacy. This criterion evaluates the scope and concept of planned activities to determine if they are sufficient to accomplish the task assigned. Synonyms for adequacy include ability, sufficiency, utility, satisfactoriness, effectual, tolerable. According to the dictionary, adequate means 1 able to satisfy a requirement; suitable or 2 barely satisfactory or sufficient. Complete ; the criterion is completeness.
A COA plan is complete if it answers what, where, when, why, and how. Synonyms for completeness are wholeness, intactness. AHD defines complete as having all necessary or normal parts. Complete suggests the final stage in a process of assembling parts into a whole.
Distinguishable ; the criterion is distinguishability. Synonyms for distinguish are differentiate, discriminate, recognition. The disctionary defines distinguish as to recognize as being different or distinct. Distinct means 1 not similar; different; unlike; or 2 well-defined; explicit; unquestionable.
Distinguishability means the distinguishing elements of a COA should be enumerated and explained, evaluation criteria action plan retail.
Feasible ; the criterion is feasibility. A COA plan is feasible if it may evaluation criteria action plan retail accomplished with the resources currently available or obtainable. Synonyms for feasibility include practicable, expedient especially in terms of timely, wise, fitting.
AHD defines feasible as 1 capable of being accomplished or brought about; practicable; possible. Suitable ; the criterion is suitability. A COA plan is suitable if it accomplishes the mission. Synonyms for suitability include fitness, evaluation criteria action plan retail, timeliness, expedience, evaluation criteria action plan retail, adequate.
AHD defines suitable as appropriate to a given purpose or occasion. Variable or varied ; the criterion is variety. A COA plan is variable if it can be modified or altered systematically.
Synonyms for variety are difference and assortment. AHD defines variety evaluation criteria action plan retail 1 the condition or quality of being varied or 2 a different kind, sort or form. The two meanings of variety suggest possibly different ways to interpret the criterion during COA plan development. Variety among COA plans in approach is desirable. The above discussion should provide a starting point for systematically evaluating proposed plans. The criterion variety should be subjected to additional scrutiny during analysis to insure perceived variety among COA is meaningful and useful.
There is a conceptual overlap among some criteria and some testing of any evaluation protocol or rubric is desirable. In general, I think the likelihood questions will be most useful for evaluating the overall quality of plans during the development phase of planning. Wednesday, October 3, UTC.
What criteria should be used for evaluating proposed plans? A partial list of evaluation questions linked to acceptability include: A partial list of evaluation questions linked to adequacy include: A partial list of evaluation questions linked to completeness include: A partial list of evaluation questions linked to distinguishability include: A partial list of evaluation questions linked to feasibility include: A partial list of evaluation questions linked to suitability include: A partial list of evaluation community event action plan linked to variety include: Power see his home page.
COM sm is maintained by Alexander P. Please contact them at djpower gmail. See disclaimer and privacy statement. This page was last modified on December 8,